| | |  |
Men's Watches | Home » » Seiko Men's SNP017 Coutura Kinetic Perpetual Watch | | | | | | | Description: | | Seiko Coutura where innovation meets refinement. Time is perpetual: Now there’s a watch to reflect it. By the simple movement of your wrist, the rechargable battery charges itself. Once fully charged, it captures and stores energy up to six months. Kinetic – the most advanced electronic watch technology. This masculine watch has a brushed steel case with a Black Ion Finish and is presented on an attractive link bracelet; polished steel bezel is accented with studded detail. The attractive black dial has Lumi Brite hands and markers with twelve month and twenty-four hour subdials. The calendar is accurate to 2100. 100 meters water resistant.Kinetic: A powerhouse in technological innovation
Like mechanical and quartz, Kinetic is a platform. Over the past 20 years, SEIKO has created on this platform a suite of Kinetic movements, each bringing unique features to the consumer.
It was at the 1986 Basel Fair that SEIKO unveiled its first Kinetic prototype. Introduced under the trial name of 'AGM', it was the first watch in the world to convert kinetic movement into electrical energy. It was the first step in a development that, 20 years later, has made Kinetic synonymous with environmental friendliness, high performance and long-lasting convenience to a generation of users worldwide. From the launch in 1988 of the first commercially available watch (then under the new name AGS) until today, over eight million Kinetic watches have been sold (as of 2007).
In 1998, Kinetic Auto Relay was released, extending the 'at-rest' operating period of the watch to a remarkable 4 years. 1999 saw the launch of the Ultimate Kinetic Chronograph, a masterpiece which fused the very best of SEIKO's mechanical and electronic watch making skills, and in 2003 another Kinetic Chronograph was launched. At Baselworld 2005, the Kinetic Perpetual made its first appearance, combining Kinetic convenience and longevity with a perpetual calendar, correct to the year 2100. In 2007, SEIKO's emotional technology Kinetic Direct Drive is introduced. | | | Features: | |
• Kinetic movement; functions without a battery; powers Kinetically with the movement of your arm
• Strong scratch resistant sapphire crystal
• Case diameter: 41.5 mm
• Stainless steel case; black dial; date function
• Water resistant up to 330 feet (100 M)
| | | Product Details: | | | Product Weight:
| 1.0 pounds | | Package Length:
| 5.0 inches | | Package Width:
| 3.9 inches | | Package Height:
| 3.3 inches | | Package Weight:
| 0.7 pounds | | Average Customer Rating:
|  based on 33 reviews |
| | | Watch Information: | | | Crystal Material:
| scratch-resistant-sapphire | | Clasp:
| fold-over-clasp-with-double-push-button-safety | | Case Diameter:
| 42 millimeters | | Case Thickness:
| 13 unknown-units | | Case Material:
| stainless-steel | | Band Material:
| stainless-steel | | Bezel Material:
| stainless-steel | | Dial Color:
| black | | Movement:
| japanese-quartz | | Calendar:
| Date | | Water Resistance Depth:
| 330 feet |
| | | | Customer Reviews: | |
Average Customer Review:
 ( 33 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
60 of 61 found the following review helpful:
 Nice looking watch, but one serious flaw...May 25, 2009
By Mark E
This is a very nice watch, but in my opinion it has some flaws; one serious. I returned the watch because of this.
One of the qualities I liked about this watch was its attractive black finish. It's made from anodized stainless steel, which should increase wear resistance (but not prevent it). In fact, one Seiko salesperson explained to me that scratches would hardly show because of this, as the metal was black throughout. This of course is not true, to my understanding anodizing does a lot of things, but in this case it's used to increase wear resistance and provides better adhesion of the top coat (If anybody knows more about anodizing, please feel free to comment).
Nevertheless, I expected the black finish would eventually wear off, but not so easily, or in the first week. Moreover, I only wore it in the office, and even kept it under my sleeve. Where the finish came off was on the band -- obviously caused from using a keypad and resting my arm on the desk. The links all the way from the latch up to the crown (on one side) wore down creating a silver streak down the middle.
The finish should not have worn off this easily, but as a warning to those interested in this color, I would not wear it while using a keypad if your arm rests on the desk, and definitely not for sports or outdoor activities.
The other issue, while not a big deal is the Kinetic function and the size of the watch, though I understand this is preference. Apparently, the Seiko Kinetic movement does not fit in small packages (that's why it's not offered in woman's watches). But another disadvantage is functionality of the sleep mode. Take in mind this is not an automatic watch, but a quartz (they call it an "automatic quartz"). It uses the automatic movement only to store energy in a rechargeable battery (or some type of capacitor) which then powers the quartz movement. After 24-hours of inactivity, it goes into sleep mode but continues to keep time. In sleep mode time is maintained not by the quartz movement, but by a microchip. In my opinion, this defeats the advantage of quartz accuracy over automatic movement watches because the accuracy may be lost each time the watch emerges from sleep, and just like an automatic may still need to be adjusted when woken up (as Seiko advises in the manual). However, the IC is rated at plus/minus 15 seconds per month, so it's not that big a deal but worth noting. I think a better design would be to kick into sleep mode only when the battery is running low. Better yet, they should just use a regular battery and be done with it (the rechargeable battery will eventually have to be replaced anyway - at a much higher cost). This would also reduce the size and weight. After all, it is a quartz. There's nothing wrong with a quartz (I prefer quartz), but if you want an automatic, get a real one. Seiko makes great auto watches for dirt cheap, and for about the same price as this watch, you can get a beautiful Swiss made Tissot, such as the PRS 516.
As far as the pros:
1. The perpetual calendar is a great feature, I wish more watches had this feature (why I bought it).
2. Seiko quartz movements keep great time, though this ran a tad fast (about +2 seconds per week; though that's still good)
3. Great looking watch
4. Very well built and rugged (except for the finish on the band)
I would still recommend this watch if you like the style, but would suggest the silver, and only for those who don't mind a larger, and slightly heavy timepiece.
* * * * * *
UPDATE: See my photos added in customer images
49 of 51 found the following review helpful:
IMO the most beautiful watch money can buyDec 09, 2007
By Jason Rodgers
I'm a man who does his research before purchasing, and I also like to think that I have good style. This watch was compared to watches ranging from $100 to $3000, and none had the styling that this one possessed. Talk about an every-day any-occasion watch! This will look just as stylish with a suit as it will with casual clothes. The price IS quite expensive for ANY watch, but here's my pro's and con's:
Pro's:
1) Beauty
2) Saphire crystal lens which can not be scratched unless done so by saphires, diamonds, or perhaps other gems(?).
3) Kinetic drive = never worry about a battery again.
4) Holds date and time if it goes into power-saving mode (up to 4 years if it were fully charged prior to power-saving mode) - just shake it and it will readjust itself automatically! Power-saving mode is only activated if the watch has not moved for 24 hours.
5) Perpetual calendar - Never have to adjust the date to account for leap years or 28-31 days in a month.
6) It's a Seiko!
Con's:
1) No timer, alarm, chronograph.
2) Cost (subjective)
The lack of anything but time and calendar was a huge disappointment to me as I often use a timer or alarm on my watches. However, I have a cell-phone that can easily double for such tasks, or I can use other items to fill this void. The watch was a graduation present from my parents (yes, I helped them pick it out for me ;) ), and I know I will cherish it every time I look at it - for many many years!
15 of 17 found the following review helpful:
Simply the best, but not 100% perfect...Oct 16, 2008
By M. Olson
"bone jammer"
If it were possible, my actual rating would be somewehre between a 4.5 and 4.9. All other reviewers have hit the nail on the head! This watch does exactly what it says, and look beautiful.
While some gripe about a seemingly superfluous "Leap Year Dial", they fail to realize that it's this little dial that makes this watch such a marvel. In addition to the kinetic energy charge with power saving feature to ensure you'll never need a battery change, you will also never have to set the date again. How many watches actually have these two features?!
I only have a few minor reservations, so I'll list them first.
CONS:
- Weight: the watch is sometimes listed as "titanium" but is actually rather heavy (but not unbearable)
- Calendar features: no day of the week
- Finish: requires constant cleaning, as it's very prone to smudges. Also easy to scratch. This is not a good watch for outdoor activities :)
PROS:
- Impeccable timekeeping: in addition to excellent calendar, this watch doesn't miss a beat, and will go to "sleep" after 24 hours of inactivity to ensure it.
- Finish: looks gorgeous. Depending on the light, it's a nice black, or light shiny gunmetal.
- Size: I have quite a small wrist, and although this is a rather large watch, it still fits snugly around with a band adjustment.
- Bezel: virtually scratch free, clear, easy to clean, and shiny
- Price: while the list is $775, most places will sell around $450. I'd expect a watch like this to sell for thousands.
In conclusion, any watch aficionado will appreciate this watch for it's sheer beauty and features for it is a well crafted piece of jewelry. You'll just have to get used to cleaning & wearing a watch that's slightly heavier than most.
17 of 20 found the following review helpful:
Very beautiful watch.Dec 20, 2008
By Fenn
"Vee"
I have had this watch for 6 months now. I agree with the other reviewers, it looks so much better than in the pictures.
Sometimes at work, when the watch is hidden under my sleeve, and I let it show, the looks on the faces of the people around me is as if a girl just "flashed" her "boobs" in front of them, pardon my expression.
10 of 12 found the following review helpful:
Excellent Design! Works Splendidly!Oct 04, 2008
By Frederick Baptist
I spent quite a bit of time looking for a good, trustworthy watch that would last a long time after I went through a string of cheap watches that barely lasted me on average for 2 years each time. I thought I had that when I got a Klaus Kobec about 4 years ago but sure enough after about 2 years it started giving me problems and so I decided to spend a bit more for quality and after doing lots of research online, I came across this watch from Seiko which claimed to be able to perform without ever having to have a battery change.
Like everyone else, I had heard of Seiko and I figured a brand that has sponsored sporting events as official timer cannot be half bad and so I decided to take a chance. I deliberately held off doing this review for a few months because I wanted to be as objective as possible and to give this watch a chance to disappoint my initial impressions over the first few months but I have been "disappointed". This is by far the best watch that I have ever owned and I really like the way if you don't wear this watch for a long period of time and so the kinetic energy runs out the moment you put this on and swing your arm for a bit the watch automatically adjusts itself to the correct time. This new kinetic technology amazes me and I'm glad that I will save some bucks on having to make regular battery changes over the many, many years that I expect to use this watch.
The display is also very pretty and looks even better up close as the picture on this site doesn't do it justice. It's been a few months now and now that I've given enough time for the novelty effect to wear off, I can safely say that I still like this watch a lot and I can see myself wearing this for a long, long time to come.
Highly recommended!
See all 33 customer reviews on Amazon.com
| | |
|
